Civil Disobedience

CNN.com – Soldier’s mom invites media coverage of casket

This is an interesting article for a couple of reasons. First, I think it’s a cool thing for McCaffrey to do and a unique way of protesting both the war and the restrictions the Pentagon has placed on the press. Second, despite the focus of the article, the only included picture is of the soldier’s parents watching, but there is no picture of the casket itself.

Fahrenheit 9/11

According to an AP review of “Fahrenheit 9/11”, the movie “will reinforce whatever opinions people had when they walked into the theater — about President Bush, its subject, and Moore.” I went to see it tonight at the Midtown Cinema with no fully formed thoughts about its subject — general dislike for both Bush & Moore aside — and left feeling much the same way.

I’d never seen a Michael Moore film before and mostly thought of him as arrogant and obnoxious. Admittedly, I’d done what I could to avoid hearing and reading about him because I knew I disagreed with his agenda, but from what I had picked up, my gut took over and I instinctively hated him. My image of him shifted slightly as a result of “Fahrenheit,” but is not much more favorable than it was. He’s a master propangandist with a talent for pushing buttons and moving audiences, but I don’t feel any more educated than I did at the beginning of the evening.

Let me say right now that I want Bush out of office. I am extremely disappointed in him and his administration and am terrified at the prospect of four more years of the same.

On the other hand, I am not convinced of the conspiracy theories I hear from all corners of the political arena, and “Fahrenheit” did nothing to bring me any closer to a conclusion. While it succeeded in raising quite a few “what ifs?”, it did nothing to fill in the holes. And because Moore’s agenda is so blatant it’s impossible to believe him without seeing all of the documents he referenced and probably more — just as Bush’s agenda is so blatant that it’s impossible to believe him.

I was also skeptical about Moore’s portrayal of Bush. In one sequence Bush was a bumbling idiot, then a pawn of his father and his cohorts, then a scheming and greedy businessman masterfully engineering an elaborate plot. It’s possible that he really is all three but I find it more likely that he’s being represented this way so that any anti-Bushite watching the movie will an image with which they can identify.

Most of the movie, in fact, appealed to base emotions rather than reason, just as it condemned the administration for resorting to fear to control the population. Images of young soldiers talking about their fears and the violent music they listened to while bombing Baghdad were interesting and moving but would remain the same in any military conflict and are not the product of an unjust war. Lila Lipscomb’s loss is heartbreaking, but the images of her visiting the White House were cloying and over the top.

This is a great campaign piece for the Democratic party, or, really, for anyone who opposes Bush. It will help them feel righteous about their beliefs and perhaps even persuade some who are still on the fence about the fall election. But it doesn’t deserve the genre title ‘documentary’, even if Moore is correct in all of his assertions.

Completely unrelated to the movie itself, it was heartening to see so many people flocking to the Midtown. I tried to go yesterday evening but even arriving before tickets went on sale wasn’t early enough to make it in. We arrived at the theater around 6:20 tonight, for a 7:00 showing, and judged that the crowd out front was even larger than yesterday’s, so came back at 8:15 for a 9:30 showing. The Midtown doesn’t sell tickets in advance because they “don’t have a computer”, so there was no way to know whether or not we were going to make it in then either, until a theater employee with a manual counter came through the line asking everyone how many tickets they were planning to purchase. When he reached the end of the line he said, “As long as no one’s lying to me, we have 93 people.” There were 138 seats, all of which were full by the time the movie started.

The Midtown is the only theater in the area playing “Fahrenheit”, but it’s exciting to see that there are that many people interested enough to stand in line for over an hour and sit in uncomfortable seats watching a tiny screen. The audience was diverse, both racially and chronologically, though skewed toward young and white. I didn’t know there were that many young people in the area, let alone that many young people who cared enough to see a movie like “Fahrenheit.” I hope it encourages them to continue thinking.

Reagan

A Time for Choosing

“You and I are told we must choose between a left or right, but I suggest there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down. Up to man’s age-old dream-the maximum of individual freedom consistent with order or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism. Regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would sacrifice freedom for security have embarked on this downward path.”
-Ronald Reagan
October 27, 1964

It’s a great speech, and so relevant today. I just wish one of the current candidates offered any significant amount of individual freedom. Reagan may not have been ideal, but the ideals he talks about in this speech are.

Liberal media?

CNN.com – Gallup poll shows tight race for presidency – May 6, 2004

This article talks about more of what we already know, but what’s interesting to me is the side-by-side pictures of Kerry and Bush at the top.

I know CNN is supposedly pretty liberal, but Kerry looks like a droopy cartoon dog while Bush looks like a War President. Kerry doesn’t always look that silly, and they could have used any stock photo they wanted. Why this one?

Thank god we’re not superficial enough to let a candidate’s looks influence how we vote…

PA in the Middle East

The Daily Star – Opinion Articles – Hearing Iraq’s echo in Pennsylvania election politics

Many thanks to Kristin Dailey for letting me know about this article, an interesting look at PA’s importance in the upcoming presidential election from a Middle Eastern perspective.

As I told her, I was startled to see that Bush received more votes in the Pennsylvania primary than all the Democratic candidates combined. I would have guessed that fewer Republicans would bother voting in a closed primary with only one Republican presidential candidate, resulting in a higher Dem:GOP ratio than we’ll see in the fall. But perhaps Specter/Toomey battle brought Republicans out, or maybe the Democratic voters didn’t come out because Kerry already had the nomination.

What startled me even more was that this article makes it sound like the most conservative Republicans voted for Specter not because they agree with him on the issues, but simply because Bush told them to.

Scary.

Election Day

Yesterday was the Pennsylvania primary election. I knew it was, but I didn’t think about it until Mike Daniel IMed me at 7:30 in the evening to remind me that I had half an hour left in which to vote. I didn’t vote.

I’ve never voted, which I guess is not that unusual, especially for someone my age, but it is sometimes a source of guilt for me. I think about politics a lot. Sometimes I go weeks obsessing over a single issue, struggling to find a solution I’ll feel comfortable with. I enjoy arguing politics with people. And, perhaps most relevantly, I can’t stand our current administration and spend a lot of time and energy complaining about it. To then not vote feels hypocritical to me.

The problem is that I don’t know who I’d put in office instead of Bush. Not only isn’t there one politician with whom I agree on most issues, but the vast majority of politicians today stand for things that I am vehemently opposed to. Historically I’ve identified myself as Libertarian, but over the last few months I’ve started to drift away from even that. I worry that one of these days I’ll wake up and find myself ready to vote Green, just out of desperation to believe in someone.

I recently read The Radical Center, which views this as a widespread issue and attempts to address the problem. Written by Ted Halstead and Michael Lind soon after September 11th in 2001, the book cites low voter turnout and recent survey results as evidence that a majority of Americans are dissatisfied with their options and that new solutions to existing problems are necessary. Citizens, they argue, don’t want to have to choose between reproductive choice and school choice, or between a free market and a sustainable environmental policy, just to name a few.

To remedy the situation, the authors propose a shift in our social contract, as well as novel approaches to partial Social Security privatization, school vouchers, universal healthcare, and more. Their aim is to maximize personal responsibility and choice, while still doing their best to insure that all Americans will be able to maintain a basic standard of living.

To my surprise, I found myself moved by their arguments. I believe the Libertarian line that the only innate rights are life, liberty, & the pursuit of happiness (I’m actually not sure about this one — how is this different from liberty?), but I also hate the idea of living in a society with a huge class division. Even if it’s not wrong on the most basic level that the deprivation of the three aforementioned rights is, isn’t it still morally questionable? And yet, is it the government’s job to determine morals, beyond the protection of those first three?

I keep coming at these questions from every angle I can think of, and all I can come up with is that I don’t know, and I don’t even know how to figure it out, but I do know that every option presented to me feels wrong to an extent that I don’t feel good about casting my vote for any of them. So for now I vote my conscience by not voting at all, and hope that one of these days I’ll figure it all out so that I can run for office myself. In the meantime, I think everyone should read The Radical Center and tell me what they think.

Aboriginal woman puts curse on Australian PM

CNN.com – Aboriginal curse put on Howard – Apr 20, 2004

Why on earth is this on the front page of CNN? That’s not a headline! News organizations have some responsibility to only report actual news. If I run up to the president and yell, “Woe unto thee, thou breaker of the commandments, for you will be pursued into the mountains by sex-mad baboons!” it’s NOT NEWS. Neither is this. But you already know that. Right?

Freedom of Speech

Tonight, my aunt found a wadded up piece of notebook paper in my grandmother’s driveway. It read as follows:

GIVE ME A BREAK!

Just for the record, the freedom of speech of every United States citizen is protected an [sic] ensured by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. I think it is completely disgusting that the FCC, a government group that consists of appointed not elected people, can analyze, judge, and pick and choose what someone can say and hear on the radio and TV.

I have in my car still my sign from Bush’s visit that reads “America is a Free Speech Zone”, in the backseat in such a way that it is easily readable from the outside. It makes me wonder if someone threw the note in response to the sign, or if it was just a random discard. I would like to know who wrote it, as I completely agree with the the (albeit brief) statement made. Earlier in the afternoon I learned of a connection I have to a woman who does handwriting analysis — I’d ask her to look at it if it weren’t written in all caps…