The Internal Revenue Service has warned a prominent liberal church that it could lose its tax-exempt status because of an anti-war sermon a guest preacher gave on the eve of the 2004 presidential election, according to church officials.
So…enlisting churches to help with the re-election of the president is okay.
Giving a sermon about the fundamental tenets of Christianity — “Thou shalt not kill” and all that — is not?
I’m not sure about The Middle America Chronicle’s assertion that as long as a church “doesn’t specifically say “Vote Republican†or “Elect Democrats,†it shouldn’t be intimidated by the IRS,” but certainly a church’s tax-exempt status shouldn’t be called into question simply for preaching a sermon that extrapolates values to real world issues.
The sermon is archived on the church’s website. It is certainly critical of Bush, and does say things like, “When you go into the voting booth on Tuesday, take with you all that you know about Jesus, the peacemaker. Take all that Jesus means to you. Then vote your deepest values.” At no point, though, does it actually endorse Kerry or any part of his “plan”.
Clearly I’m not an expert on tax-exempt rules, and I am probably a bit biased in this particular case, but I think this is okay. It’s certainly a far cry from paying for an advertisement, which the Post cites as an example of activity conducted by a church that previously lost its status. And I’m sure there were much more blatant endorsements coming from less prominent pulpits that Sunday.